Japan

Asia

GDP per Capita ($)
$33898.9
Population (in 2021)
124.5 million

Assessment

Country Risk
A2
Business Climate
A1
Previously
A2
Previously
A1

suggestions

Summary

Strengths

  • Privileged location in a dynamic region
  • High national savings rate (around 25% of GDP) and an improving current account surplus
  • A pickup in productivity-enhancing capex (digitalisation, decarbonisation)
  • Participation in multiple trade agreements (RCEP, CPTPP)
  • Public debt over 90%-owned by domestic investors
  • Excellent corporate payment behaviour

Weaknesses

  • Reduction of the workforce due to ageing population and low immigration contribution
  • High public debt level and increasing fiscal debt servicing burden
  • Low productivity in services and SMEs
  • Rising insolvencies among SMEs due to higher labor costs and interest expenses
  • Heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels
  • Japan-China-Russia tensions over disputed islands
  • Heightened risk of political instability as the ruling party has lost its majority in both houses for the first time in its seven-decade history

Trade exchanges

Exportof goods as a % of total

United States of America
20%
China
18%
Europe
9%
South Korea
7%
Taiwan (Republic of China)
6%

Importof goods as a % of total

China 22 %
22%
United States of America 11 %
11%
Europe 9 %
9%
Australia 8 %
8%
United Arab Emirates 5 %
5%

Sector risks assessments

Outlook

The economic outlook highlights the opportunities and risks ahead, helping to anticipate major changes. This analysis is essential for any company seeking to adapt to changes in the business environment.

Structural economic recovery largely intact

Japan’s GDP expanded by 1.6% in the first three quarters of 2025, well above the Bank of Japan’s potential growth estimate of around 0.5%. The outperformance can be partially attributed to a low base a year ago when auto production and exports were disrupted by a safety scandal. But the structural recovery in private investment and consumption has maintained solid momentum. Gross capital formation posted its fastest year-over-year growth since 2014, led by transport and machinery equipment. This surge was underpinned by strong corporate earnings, while tax incentives for industrial automation and EV-related investments likely outweighed the drag from higher interest expenses. Meanwhile, private consumption has risen for six consecutive quarters as inbound tourism supported durable goods and tourism-related services sales, while robust wage growth helped offset rising living costs for domestic households. Externally, the frontloading effect was relatively muted in Japan. The trend is largely due to Japan’s heavy reliance on automobile exports to the US where Section 232 tariffs have remained in place since early Q2. This contrasts with markets where delayed full implementation of reciprocal tariffs to Q3 triggered a rush to ship goods ahead of higher tariffs. Meanwhile, trade restructuring, particularly the pivot toward tech goods exports to emerging Asia, has supported growth.

Looking ahead to 2026, we expect Japan’s economy to moderate as the impact of US tariffs filters through. However, growth could remain above potential, supported by the structural recovery in domestic activity and increased fiscal support. Despite the trade agreement, Japanese automakers’ decision to absorb tariffs on US-bound shipments to protect market share may erode corporate profits and potentially make firms more cautious about increasing capital expenditure. The decision could also temper the pace of wage hikes in the manufacturing sector. Nevertheless, overall wage growth across the economy—where services account for roughly 80% of employment—should remain supported by resilient domestic services activity and structural labour market tightness. In the meantime, the newly formed Takaichi administration has approved a ¥21.3 trillion stimulus package (representing around 3.3% of GDP) that focuses on inflation countermeasures, capital expenditure in crisis management and growth, and increased defence spending. The package is still pending parliamentary approval, which is likely to occur by year-end and may be amended during negotiations with opposition parties given the ruling coalition’s lack of a majority in both houses. However, given the broad expansionary stance across most parties, significant cuts are unlikely and the stimulatory effects should largely filter through in 2026.

Renewed concerns over fiscal sustainability

Japan’s current account surplus continued to improve in 2025, widening from 4.7% of GDP in 2024 to 5.0% during the first three quarters of 2025. The improvement was driven primarily by reduced imports due to a pickup in yen strength and lower coal and crude oil prices. Meanwhile, stronger exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to Southeast Asian markets mitigated the decline in automotive exports that were hit by tariffs. The services trade deficit also narrowed as a surge in inbound tourism boosted the travel services surplus, partially offsetting higher costs for foreign software, digital tools and other business services. In addition, the primary income surplus further strengthened, supported by higher returns on equity investments.

However, rising interest rates and political momentum for fiscal expansion have reignited concerns over Japan’s fiscal position. Persistently elevated inflation above the BOJ’s 2% target, combined with rate hikes and the BOJ’s decision to reduce JGB purchases, has pushed government bond yields to multi-decade highs across most maturities. On the positive side, Japan’s fiscal position has improved in recent years. For the first time since FY2007, the primary deficit narrowed to around 1% of GDP in FY2024. The improvement largely reflects surging tax revenues as yen depreciation and post-pandemic inflation boosted corporate and consumption tax receipts, while higher wages lifted income tax collections. The shrinking primary deficit, together with strong nominal GDP growth, reduced the public debt-to-GDP ratio from a peak of 216% in FY2022 FY to 207% in FY2024, according to government estimates.

However, these improvements risk being reversed. Prolonged inflation has fuelled household dissatisfaction, which resulted in the ruling coalition losing its parliamentary majority and in calls for fiscal expansion across most parties. The limited effectiveness in easing inflation burden from temporary relief measures, such as cash handouts and subsidies, has sparked demands for more permanent changes like fuel and consumption tax cuts. Both measures are included in the recently drafted supplementary budget under the Takaichi administration. Yet implementing these changes without securing alternative revenue sources or cutting expenditure would inevitably heighten fiscal sustainability risks.

Signs of a return to “Abenomics” and deteriorating relationship with China

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) elected Sanae Takaichi, a key figure in former Prime Minister Abe’s cabinet and runner-up in last year’s LDP presidential race, its new leader on 4 October. She succeeded Shigeru Ishiba after his resignation following the party’s loss of its upper house majority. But her path to becoming Prime Minister was far from smooth, complicated by Komeito’s exit from the coalition’s decade-long alliance, though later resolved by a new partnership with the Japan Innovation Party. Takaichi has been a vocal supporter of Abenomics but also signalled respect for the Bank of Japan’s independence in monetary policy normalisation amid persistent inflationary pressures and a weak yen. Consequently, her economic stimulus approach is expected to lean heavily on fiscal measures, exemplified by the massive fiscal package approved a mere one month after taking office. In line with Abe’s legacy, Takaichi has also advocated assertive foreign policy stances, including accelerating plans to raise defence spending to 2% of GDP and amending constitutional rules that prohibit Japan from possessing armed forces.

Meanwhile, Japan and China have been at loggerheads following Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks that a Chinese military attack on Taiwan could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan. This could be a potential scenario that could justify Japan’s use of force under its 2015 security legislation which broadened the scope for collective self-defence under three new conditions. Although Takaichi has pledged to avoid similar comments going forward, Beijing condemned the statement as interference in its internal affairs and raised the issue at the United Nations. On the economic front, China has retaliated by suspending imports of Japanese seafood and imposing a tourism boycott, which has weighed on Japan’s exports and inbound consumption. Any further escalation of tensions risks disrupting ICT and advanced manufacturing supply chains. Drawing on precedents such as China-US trade tensions and the Japan–Korea dispute in 2019, China might restrict rare earth exports—critical for EV batteries and semiconductors—while Japan could tighten controls on precision equipment and specialty chemicals essential for chipmaking.

Payment & Collection practices

This section is a valuable tool for corporate financial officers and credit managers. It provides information on the payment and debt collection practices in use in the country.

Payment

Japan has ratified the International Conventions of June 1930 on Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes, and of March 1931 on Cheques. As a result, the validity of these instruments in Japan is subject to the same rules as in Europe.

The bill of exchange (kawase tegata) and the much more widely used promissory note (yakusoku tegata), when unpaid, allow creditors to initiate debt recovery proceedings via a fast-track procedure, subject to certain conditions. Although the fast-track procedure also applies to cheques (kogitte), their use is far less common for everyday transactions.

Clearing houses (tegata kokanjo) play an important role in the collective processing of the money supply arising from these instruments. The penalties for payment default act as a powerful deterrent: a debtor who fails twice in a period of six months to honour a bill of exchange, promissory note, or cheque collectable in Japan is subsequently barred for a period of two years from undertaking business-related banking transactions (current account, loans) with financial establishments attached to the clearing house. In other words, the debtor is reduced to a de facto state of insolvency.

These two measures normally result in the calling in of any bank loans granted to the debtor.

Bank transfers (furikomi), sometimes guaranteed by a standby letter of credit, have become significantly more common throughout the economy over recent decades thanks to widespread use of electronic systems in Japanese banking circles. Various highly automated interbank transfer systems are also available for local or international payments, like the Foreign Exchange Yen Clearing System (FXYCS, operated by the Tokyo Bankers Association) and the BOJ-NET Funds Transfer System (operated by the Bank of Japan). Payment made via the Internet site of the client’s bank is also increasingly common.

Debt Collection

In principle, to avoid certain disreputable practices employed in the past by specialised companies, only lawyers (bengoshi) may undertake debt collection. However, a 1998 law established the profession of “servicer” to foster debt securitisation and facilitate collection of non-performing loans (NPL debts) held by financial institutions. Servicers are debt collection companies licensed by the Ministry of Justice to provide collections services, but only for certain types of debt: bank loans, loans by designated institutions, loans contracted under leasing arrangements, credit card repayments, and so on.

Amicable phase

A settlement is always preferable, so as to avoid a lengthy and costly legal procedure. This involves obtaining, where possible, a signature from the debtor on a notarised deed that includes a forced-execution clause, which, in the event of continued default, is directly enforceable without requiring a prior court judgement.

The standard practice is for the creditor to send the debtor a recorded delivery letter with acknowledgement of receipt (naïyo shomeï), the content of which must be written in Japanese characters and certified by the post office.

As of 1 April 2020, statute of limitation period has changed.

For the debts accrued after 1 April , the statute of limitation period of the debts is 5 years from the date of the knowledge of the creditor of the collectability of the debts and 10 years from the date of the accrual of the debts in accordance with Article 166(1) of the Civil Code revised and informed as of 1 April 2020.

Legal proceedings

Fast-track proceedings

Summary proceedings, intended to allow creditors to obtain a ruling on payment (tokusoku tetsuzuki), apply to uncontested monetary claims and effectively facilitate obtaining a court order to pay (shiharaï meireï) from the judge within approximately six months.

If the debtor contests the order within two weeks of service of notice, the case is transferred to ordinary proceedings.

Ordinary proceedings

Ordinary proceedings are brought before the Summary Court (kan-i saibansho) for claims under JPY 1,400, and before the District Court (chiho saibansho) for claims above this amount. Those proceedings, partly written (with submission of arguments and exchanges of type of evidence) and partly oral (with respective hearings of the parties and their witnesses) can take from one to three years as a result of the succession of hearings. These proceedings generate significant legal costs.

The distinctive feature of the Japanese legal system is the emphasis given to civil mediation (minji chôtei). Under court supervision, a panel of mediators – usually comprised of a judge and two neutral assessors – attempts to reach, by mutual concessions of the parties, an agreement on civil and commercial disputes.

In practice, litigants often settle the case at this stage of the procedure, before a judgment is delivered. While avoiding lengthy and costly legal proceedings, any transaction obtained through such mediation becomes enforceable once approved by the court.

0

A court judgment is enforceable if no appeal is lodged within two weeks. If the debtor does not comply with the decision, compulsory measures can be ordered through an execution against Real Property (an Examination Court issues a commencement order for a compulsory auction) or an execution against a claim (a compulsory execution is commenced through an order of?seizure).

Japanese law provides for an exequatur procedure in order for foreign awards to be recognised and enforced. The court will verify several elements, such as whether the parties benefited from a due process of law, or if enforcement will be incompatible with Japanese public policy. Furthermore, if the issuing country does not have a reciprocal recognition and enforcement treaty with Japan, the decision will not be enforced by domestic courts.

Insolvency Proceedings

Restructuring

There are two types of restructuring proceedings. The first of these is corporate reorganisation proceedings (kaisha kosei), which are typically used in complex insolvency cases involving stock companies. They come with the mandatory appointment of a reorganisation trustee by the court and with a stay against enforcement by both secured and unsecured creditors. The court typically appoints a third-party bengoshi with substantial experience in restructuring cases.

The second of these is civil rehabilitation proceedings (minji saisei), which are used to rehabilitate companies of almost any size and type. The debtor-in-possession (DIP) administers the rehabilitation under supervision of a court-appointed supervisor. Enforcement by secured creditors is not stayed in principle. The debtor must enter into settlement agreements with secured creditors in order to continue using the relevant collateral to conduct their business.

Winding up proceedings

There are two winding up proceedings. In bankruptcy proceedings (hasan), the court appoints a lawyer as trustee to administer the proceedings. Enforcement by secured creditors is not stayed; rather, they can freely exercise their claims outside of the bankruptcy proceedings. The trustee will usually attempt to sell secured collateral with the agreement of the secured creditors and contribute a percentage of the sales proceeds to the estate. The debtor’s estate is distributed to creditors in accordance with prescribed statutory priorities without any need for voting by the creditors.

The second, special liquidation (tokubetsu seisan), is used for stock companies. A liquidator is appointed by either a debtor’s shareholders or the court. Distributor of the debtor’s estate to creditors has to be approved by creditors with claims to two-thirds or more of the total debt or by way of settlement. This procedure is used when the debtor’s shareholders are confident that they will obtain creditors’ cooperation for the liquidation process, and wish to control the liquidation process without involvement of a trustee.

0

Last updated:December 2025

Other country with similar country risk